Date of final exam: 18/05/2005E-mail: verrelli@ing.uniroma2.it
Tutor: Prof. R. Marino, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NONLINEAR CONTROL DESIGN FOR INDUCTION MOTORS AND SYNCHRONOUS GENERATORSAdvisors:
Prof. R. Marino, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"
Prof. P. Tomei, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"
Summary of the thesis:
The thesis incorporates recent advances in the design of nonlinear control laws for induction motors
and synchronous generators: robust, adaptive, state or output feedback control techniques are used for
both these electro-mechanical systems which are modelled by finite dimensional, deterministic ordinary
differential equations and are possibly affected by uncertainties, such as unknown constant and time-varying
parameters.
Induction motors, which, due to their simpler construction, are more reliable and less expensive than
those permanent magnet, switched reluctance and d.c. motors are difficult to control for several reasons:
their dynamics are intrinsically nonlinear and multivariable (two control inputs and two outputs to be
controlled); not all of the state variables and not all of the outputs to be controlled may be available for
feedback; there are critical uncertain parameters such as load torque, which is typically unknown in all
electrical drives, and rotor resistance, which, due to rotor heating, may vary up to 100% during operations.
The availability of low cost powerful digital signal processors and advances in power electronics made
complex algorithms implementable even for medium- and small- size induction motors, which, in this way,
could replace currently used motors provided that high dynamic tracking performance along with high-power
effciency are achieved: this is what motivated intense research efforts in induction motor control
design.
In analogous way, transient stabilization and voltage regulation for power systems are classically difficult
control problems: all the dynamic models which have been developed for a single machine connected to
an infinite bus show an intrinsic nonlinear nature and, consequently, there are several stable and unstable
equilibrium points. Early studies aimed at determining the stability regions of desired operating conditions
by means of Lyapunov functions in order to study the effect of perturbations. In fact, sudden mechanical
and electrical perturbations may drive the system outside its stability region and force the generator to
be disconnected from the network. The transient stabilization and voltage regulation problem consists
in the design of an excitation control which keeps the generator speed close to the synchronous speed
when perturbations occur (transient stabilization) and regulates the output voltage to the corresponding
reference value in the case of permanent constant perturbations (voltage regulation). To this purpose,
linear controllers are actually employed which are designed on the basis of linear approximations around
operating conditions: only small perturbations and deviations from operating conditions can be handled.
It is clear that nonlinear controllers are required to handle the large perturbations that typically occur in
power systems.
The thesis is divided into two parts: Part I (induction motor) consists of Chapters 2, 3 and 4 while
Part II (synchronous generator) consists of Chapters 5 and 6. Chapters 2 and 3 address the problem of
controlling a speed- sensorless induction motor: the existence of a global controller is explored in Chapter
2, while a nonlinear adaptive control scheme is developed in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 is devoted to nonlinear
control design for a sensorless induction motor: an output feedback control algorithm is proposed. Chapters
5 and 6 address the problem of controlling a synchronous generator with parameter uncertainty: a nonlinear
robust adaptive transient stabilizing control is presented in Chapter 5, while Chapter 6 proposes a nonlinear
robust adaptive transient stabilizing and output regulating control algorithm.
_______________________________________